Case Summary
The plaintiff Shahul Hameed was absent and not represented. The defendant Jiji was also not represented, leading to the court rejecting the plaint due to unpaid court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to lack of representation and unpaid fees.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and not represented, leading to dismissal.
Plaintiff was absent and not represented, leading to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Judgment Evidence:
The plaint is rejected (Pronounced by me in open court on this the 17th day of February, 2025)
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shahul Hameed
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jiji
- Party Age
- 29
Plaintiffs Documents
Court fee, LBF
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sudheesh Kumar.A.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.V. Raveendran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint is rejected
Evidence:
Plaint is rejected
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shahul Hameed vs Jiji regarding rejection of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Shahul Hameed vs Jiji regarding rejection of suit