Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
EP 108/2017

Case between Secretary perumanna Klari Service Sahakaran Bank No.F.770 vs Kunhimarakkar Poozithara regarding default on enquiry

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court at Tirur, Malappuram
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2018-01-10
Duration
0 years, 8 months, 28 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

A case filed by the Decree Holder, a bank, against the Judgment Debtor for default on enquiry, resulting in the dismissal of the Execution Petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The Execution Petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was not ready for enquiry despite repeated chances.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed for default
Case Type
Civil Suit - Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.

Judgment Evidence:

Petitioner absent. Even after repeated chances were given the petitioner is not ready for enquiry. Hence EP is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Secretary perumanna Klari Service Sahakaran Bank No.F.770 (1 years) Kuttippala post

Defendants

Kunhimarakkar Poozithara (65 years) Poozhithara, Perumanna, Klari, Kuttipala

Reliefs

Relief Type: Dismissal
Outcome: Dismissed for Default
Description:
Dismissal of Execution Petition for default
Evidence:
Petitioner absent. Even after repeated chances were given the petitioner is not ready for enquiry. Hence EP is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
Case Filed
Tue, 05/23/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases