Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P. 21 / 2023

Case between The Secretary, Health Amenities Multi purpose District Co-operative Society Limited No.D-2738 vs Jijil Kumar regarding execution petition for payment of decretal amount.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Judge
Sri.Vivek.P
Order Date
2025-03-29
Duration
Case Code No.
21
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner is the Secretary of a co-operative society seeking to recover a debt from the respondent, Jijil Kumar, who claims he has no means to pay. The case involves inquiries into the respondent's financial status.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The execution petition against the respondent is dismissed as he successfully proved that he has no means to pay the decretal amount. The court found the petitioner's claims unconvincing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition against the respondent is dismissed as he successfully proved that he has no means to pay the decretal amount. The court found the petitioner's claims unconvincing.
Key Reasoning:
The respondent successfully demonstrated a lack of sufficient income or assets to pay the decree debt.
Why Defendant Won:
The respondent successfully demonstrated a lack of sufficient income or assets to pay the decree debt.
Supporting Evidence
Considering the evidence adduced by both sides, it is clear that the respondent could convince the court that he has no sufficient income or assets to pay off the decree debt.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, EP is dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Secretary, Health Amenities Multi purpose District Co-operative Society Limited No.D-2738
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jijil Kumar
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
Sri.VP Radhakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioner sought recovery of a decretal amount from the respondent.
Evidence:
Considering the evidence adduced by both sides, it is clear that the respondent could convince the court that he has no sufficient income or assets to pay off the decree debt.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The document is a copy of the settlement agreement regarding evictions and reflects the financial situation of the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This statement shows the financial status of the respondent as part of the inquiry into their means.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Medical Records
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
These records show the respondent's health condition, which may impact their ability to pay.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Court Document
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This is a plaint copy related to the eviction proceedings initiated by the landlord.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Building Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This certificate indicates ownership details for the house where the respondent resides.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Demand Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This notice pertains to demands related to cooperative society dues against the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.B2

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
E.P.
Case Code Year
2023

Case Flags

Arrest Involved

Quick Facts

Location
KOZHIKODE
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Praseena VP regarding execution petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kunnamangalam Co-operative Rural Housing Society Limited No.D.2025 vs Kandankutty, Girish regarding EP dismissal for default
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between The Secretary, Health Amenities Multi purpose District Co-operative Society Limited vs Jishipth KK, Pramod Kumar NV regarding decree execution.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Sukruth lal regarding Execution Petition for arrest and detention.
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mr.Santhosh.V regarding execution petition.
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Defendant Won