Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P.No.47/2024

Case between S.Chandralekha vs Mayur.H.Patel regarding possession of property.

Court
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROL
Judge
Smt.Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-03-26
Duration
Case Code No.
47
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

S.Chandralekha is the petitioner seeking possession of property, while Mayur.H.Patel is the counter petitioner who did not appear in court. The court has ordered Mayur.H.Patel to allow S.Chandralekha to take possession of the property as per the lease act.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has ordered the respondent to put the petitioner in possession of the property as per the provisions of the Kerala Building (Lease & Rent Control) Act. The respondent failed to present any explanation for non-compliance.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petitioner is granted possession of the property.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court has ordered the respondent to put the petitioner in possession of the property as per the provisions of the Kerala Building (Lease & Rent Control) Act. The respondent failed to present any explanation for non-compliance.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Respondent did not comply with the court's previous order.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Respondent did not comply with the court's previous order.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent has not seen furnished any explanation for non-compliance of the order in IA 1/24 dated 15-1-25.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the further proceedings in RCP is hereby stopped and the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the PSB u/s 12(3) of Kerala Building (Lease & Rent Control) Act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S.Chandralekha
Party Age
77
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mayur.H.Patel
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Saji.S.L
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the property.
Evidence:
Hence the further proceedings in RCP is hereby stopped and the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the PSB u/s 12(3) of Kerala Building (Lease & Rent Control) Act.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court's decision to stop further proceedings and direct the respondent to put the petitioner in possession of the property.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kuruvila Joseph vs Akilraj regarding eviction for non-payment of rent
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr.S.Krishna Kumar vs Manoj regarding possession of plaint schedule building
IN THE COURT OF THE RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Al Shine Fine Restaurants LLP et al vs Vishnu Satheesh regarding eviction for non-payment of rent
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between K.Sekharan vs Remani Stanley regarding eviction from rented premises
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between H.Muhammed Sameer et al vs Raji.N. Sujith regarding eviction of tenant
Court of Rent Control
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won