OS No. 464//2016

Case between Sathyadas vs Suseela @ Pathrosiya et al regarding Execution Petition

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA

Judge

Sri. ARAVIND.P

Order Date

2025-10-30

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sathyadas is the decree holder who is represented by his counsel. The defendants include Suseela, Robin, Susan, and Sumi, and the case involves the execution petition that has been dismissed.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Execution Petition

Final Judgment

The execution petition was dismissed as not pressed due to the decree holder's incapacity.

Key Reasoning:
The execution petition was not pursued by the decree holder's counsel.

Why Defendant Won:
The execution petition was not pursued by the decree holder's counsel.

Supporting Evidence

It is submitted that Decree Holder is no more. Learned counsel of the Decree Holder submitted that Execution Petition is not pressed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the Execution Petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sathyadas
Party Age: 72
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Suseela @ Pathrosiya
Party Age: 46

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Robin
Party Age: 44
Relation: B/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Susan
Party Age: 39
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sumi
Party Age: 38
Relation: D/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Suresh kumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Execution Petition is not pressed.

Evidence: