Case Summary
Salini is the plaintiff, and Sathyan and others are the defendants. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and no evidence being presented.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff's suit was dismissed for default as she was absent, and no evidence was presented.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Salini
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sathyan
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sathyan
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Baiju
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Navaikulam B. Sreekumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.N. Shine
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and no representation.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Salini vs Sathyan et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Salini vs Sathyan et al regarding dismissal for default.