Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 73 OF 2016

Case between Saithu Haji et al vs Rohini regarding rent arrears and eviction

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-12-18
Duration
1 year
Case Closed
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Saithu Haji, sought eviction of respondent due to rent arrears and his own bonafide need to reside in the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted eviction of the respondent and directed her to vacate the property within one month.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of respondent with one month notice
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court granted eviction of the respondent and directed her to vacate the property within one month.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved rent arrears and bonafide need for personal use of the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner proved rent arrears and bonafide need for personal use of the property.
Supporting Evidence
There is nothing to non-suit the petitioner the evidence adduced by the petitioner remained unchallenged. Therefore I find no reason to disbelieve the bonafide needs put forward by the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed under section 11(2) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saithu Haji
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o. Kunhimuhammed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rohini
Party Age
40
Plaintiffs Documents
Lawyer notice with acknowledgment card, Rent Agreement
Defendants Documents
Commission report, Plan

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of respondent with one month notice
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed under section 11(2) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sent to the respondent with acknowledgment card.
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Established terms of the rental agreement.
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Official report submitted to the court.
Reference:
C1
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Layout plan of the property.
Reference:
C2

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Rent arrears
Case Code
Case between Saithu Haji et al vs Rohini regarding rent arrears and eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Saithu Haji et al vs Rohini regarding rent arrears and eviction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sun, 12/18/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 12/18/2017 - 12:00
From
Fri, 12/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sun, 12/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Muhammed Faizal.P.T et al vs Sakeer Husain regarding rent control
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Beeran Haji vs Ali regarding rent control petition
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Vanaja Valliyil regarding Rent Control
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Ajith Kumar.U. regarding rent dispute
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Both (settled)
Case between Beeran Haji vs Habeeb Rehman regarding rent control
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won