Case Summary
The petitioner, Saithu Haji, sought eviction of respondent due to rent arrears and his own bonafide need to reside in the property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of respondent with one month notice
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved rent arrears and bonafide need for personal use of the property.
The petitioner proved rent arrears and bonafide need for personal use of the property.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed under section 11(2) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Saithu Haji (65 years)
Kadavukarakath House, Chennara amsom, Perunthuruthi desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Rohini (40 years)
Brights Beauty Care, Daru Salam White house, Post Thrikandiyur
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Eviction of respondent with one month notice
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed under section 11(2) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sent to the respondent with acknowledgment card.
Reference:
A1
Document Type:
Rent Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Established terms of the rental agreement.
Reference:
A2
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Official report submitted to the court.
Reference:
C1
Document Type:
Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Layout plan of the property.
Reference:
C2