Case Summary
This case involves decree holders Sahadevan and Mable, and judgment debtor Trosy Jayan. The court addressed an execution petition which was concluded based on a joint compromise.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was closed based on a joint compromise between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court accepted the joint compromise.
The court accepted the joint compromise.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court accepted the joint compromise.
The court accepted the joint compromise.
Supporting Evidence
The court accepted the joint compromise.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence execution petition is closed in terms of the joint compromise.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sahadevan
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mable, @ Thankachi
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Trosy Jayan
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Decree Holder
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Thrishakh. K.J
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Judgment Debtor
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V K Gopakuamar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Execution petition closed in terms of the joint compromise.
Evidence:
Hence execution petition is closed in terms of the joint compromise.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sahadevan et al vs Trosy Jayan regarding execution petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Sahadevan et al vs Trosy Jayan regarding execution petition.