Case Summary
The case involves Sachin S. as the plaintiff and Salimkutty as the defendant. The court has dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff's counsel filed a memo indicating that the suit was not pressed, leading to its dismissal.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed as not pressed. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sachin S.
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Salimkutty
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. A. Sabeer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M. Chandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M. Safeerkutty
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. A. Abdul Samad
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Kiran V.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sachin S. vs Salimkutty regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sachin S. vs Salimkutty regarding dismissal of suit