Case Summary
The plaintiff, a minor represented by her mother, sought a mandatory injunction to participate in the District Kalolsavam. However, the event had already occurred, rendering the suit infructuous.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was not represented and the event for which the injunction was sought had already taken place.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
the suit thus becomes infructuous. Suit is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rugmini Devasena Raghuram
- Party Age
- 13
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- State of Kerala
- Relation
- Rep by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- District Educational Officer(DEO)
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- General Convenor, Programme Committee, Kozhikode Revenue District Kalolsavam 2024-2025
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.M. Sebastian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bilbi.K.K
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Shamsudhin.N
- Appearance Type
- Government Pleader
- Law Firm
- Additional District Govt. Pleader & Additional Public Prosecutor
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
to direct the defendants to permit the plaintiff to participate in the District Kalolsavam held on 19/11/2024
Evidence:
The Kalolsavam already held on 19/11/2024 and the suit thus becomes infructuous. Suit is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rugmini Devasena Raghuram vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Rugmini Devasena Raghuram vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction