Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1383/2025

Case between R.Ramesh Kumar vs Jyothilekshmi.T regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-12-19
Duration
approximately-4 years 8 months
Case Code No.
1383
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

R.Ramesh Kumar, the plaintiff, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against his wife, Jyothilekshmi.T, to prevent her from obstructing his use of a property that he claims ownership of. The case arises from a tumultuous marriage that has now ended, with previous court orders related to their relationship impacting the current proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition for a temporary injunction sought by R.Ramesh Kumar, finding that he failed to establish a prima facie case or prove irreparable loss. Jyothilekshmi.T's rights were upheld due to existing protection orders.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for a temporary injunction sought by R.Ramesh Kumar, finding that he failed to establish a prima facie case or prove irreparable loss. Jyothilekshmi.T's rights were upheld due to existing protection orders.
Key Reasoning:
The respondent had obtained prior protection and residence orders, which established her rights over the property.
Why Defendant Won:
The respondent had obtained prior protection and residence orders, which established her rights over the property.
Supporting Evidence
It is found that petitioner has not made out a prima facie case with respect to relief sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this application stands dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
R.Ramesh Kumar
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jyothilekshmi.T
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Tax Receipt, Copy of Building tax of Ground Floor, Copy of Building tax of first floor, Original rental agreement
Defendants Documents
Copy of Medical Certificate, Copy of FIR No.396/2024, Copy of FIR No.1042/2024, Copy of Interim Order Passed by Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-IV, Thiruvananthapuram, Copy of Final Order in MC.No.23/2025

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.M.Harilal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Appu Aravind.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioner sought a permanent injunction to restrain the respondent from obstructing the use of the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
No prima facie case in favour of petitioner for grant of an order of injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing ownership and possession of property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Building tax of Ground Floor
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document supporting the claim related to the ground floor of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of Building tax of first floor
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document supporting the claim related to the first floor of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original rental agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the rental agreement related to the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Medical Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document evidencing physical harm allegedly caused by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Copy of FIR No.396/2024
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
First Information Report related to threats and manhandling by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Copy of FIR No.1042/2024
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
First Information Report related to abuse by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Copy of Interim Order Passed by Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-IV
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Interim order providing protection to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Copy of Final Order in MC.No.23/2025
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Final order granting protection and residence order in favor of the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report from an advocate commissioner regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Shadil Shabeer, Nizam Mohammed vs Kesavadasapuram Muslim Jama Ath et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Chakkacheril Rubbers Pvt.Ltd vs Nilambur Traders regarding dismissal of suit.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Anil kumar et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mithun John Mathew vs Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala regarding mediation agreement.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won