Case Summary
The petitioners, Roy Emerson Ivan and Margaret Roy, are seeking possession of a residential cum commercial building. The respondent Suma.S has failed to comply with the previous court order.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Possession of the Plaint Schedule Building
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondent to put the petitioners in possession of the building as they failed to comply with previous orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent did not comply with court orders and provided no explanation for non-compliance.
The respondent did not comply with court orders and provided no explanation for non-compliance.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent did not comply with court orders and provided no explanation for non-compliance.
The respondent did not comply with court orders and provided no explanation for non-compliance.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent was absent and did not furnish any explanation for non-compliance of the order.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the further proceedings in RCP is hereby stopped and the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the Plaint Schedule Building.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Roy Emerson Ivan
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Margaret Roy
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suma.S
Plaintiffs Documents
Court fee - 10.00, Legal Benefit Fund- 100.00, Vakalath fee - 6.00, Document Fee - 10.00
Defendants Documents
Vakalath fee- 6.00
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Bhagavath Singh.C.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arya.P
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Aji Gopinath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Adv.Susan.C.Roy
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the Plaint Schedule Building.
Evidence:
Hence the further proceedings in RCP is hereby stopped and the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the Plaint Schedule Building u/s12(3) of Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control).
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2024