Case Summary
The case involves a decree holder, Reghukumar, and a judgment debtor, Haridasan. The petition was filed under the Code of Civil Procedure regarding execution proceedings, and the EP was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Proceedings
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence EP dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Reghukumar
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Haridasan
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Decree Holder
- Advocate Name
- Adv.B.L.Prasanth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Judgment Debtor
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Sri. Uliyakovil S.Navas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Proceedings
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Reghukumar vs Haridasan regarding Execution Proceedings
Case Code Year
Case between Reghukumar vs Haridasan regarding Execution Proceedings