Case Summary
Multiple petitioners filed a case seeking eviction of the respondent from a property rented for a chicken stall and claiming bonafide need for starting a crockery shop.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction order and cost payment
Case Type
Eviction Case - Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners established bonafide need for eviction to start a crockery shop and the respondent failed to defend the claims.
The petitioners established bonafide need for eviction to start a crockery shop and the respondent failed to defend the claims.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed under section 11(2) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Rayin Haji (70 years)
Kooriparambil House, Kattipparuthi amsom, Valanchery desom, Tirur Taluk
Kooriparambil Veettil Rayin Haji's wife Sainabha (65 years)
Not Mentioned
Jamal (48 years)
Not Mentioned
Muhammed Saleem (42 years)
Not Mentioned
Muhammed Shaji (40 years)
Not Mentioned
Thwabir Babu (32 years)
Kattipparuthi amsom, Valanchery desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Saidali (55 years)
Chettarimmal House, Kuttippuram amsom Kolakkadu desom, Tirur Taluk, Pin 679 571
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Vacant possession of the property within one month and cost payment by the respondent.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed under section 11(2) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Registered Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of notice issued to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1