Case Summary
The plaintiffs filed a suit seeking injunction, but the suit was dismissed by the court as the plaintiff's counsel reported having no instructions from the client.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of the suit with costs
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's counsel reported having no instructions from the client.
Plaintiff's counsel reported having no instructions from the client.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for injunction. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called absent. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Rasheed @ Kunhippa (40 years)
Koottumoochi Veedu, Tanalur amsom Meenadathur desom, Tirur Taluk. P.O. Tanalur, PIN 676 107
Nisha (33 years)
Chennara amsom desom, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676 561
Komukandathil Kadar @ Kunhutty Bava (50 years)
Tanalur amsom Meenadathur desom, Tirur Taluk. P.O. Tanalur, PIN 676 107
Defendants
Ashraf.O. (38 years)
Umaiba (30 years)
Naseer (35 years)
Naseera (28 years)
Orikkal House, Tanalur amsom Meenadathur desom, Tirur Taluk. P.O. Tanalur, PIN 676 107
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Unknown
Description:
Injunction sought by plaintiffs
Evidence:
Not mentioned