Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1105/2024

Case between Rajeev Kumar vs N.C.S Autohub Pvt. Ltd et al regarding recovery of money.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration
approximately-1 year 11 days
Case Code No.
1105
Case Closed
Sat, 11/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rajeev Kumar is the plaintiff who deals in car accessories. He filed a suit against N.C.S Autohub Pvt. Ltd and its Managing Director Raju George for recovery of a total amount of ₹1,38,226/- that is due for goods purchased on credit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff Rajeev Kumar, allowing him to recover ₹1,47,176/- from the defendants with interest and cost.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Recovery of ₹1,47,176/- along with interest at 6% per annum and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff Rajeev Kumar, allowing him to recover ₹1,47,176/- from the defendants with interest and cost.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The oral and documentary evidence presented by the plaintiff established that the defendants were liable to pay the outstanding amount.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The oral and documentary evidence presented by the plaintiff established that the defendants were liable to pay the outstanding amount.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff filed an affidavit reiterating the averments in the plaint and provided evidence in support of the claim that the defendants owe ₹1,47,176/- due to the business transactions.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹1,47,176/- (Rupees One Lakh Forty-seven Thousand One Hundred and Seventy-six only) from the defendants, together with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the suit until the date of realization, from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajeev Kumar
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
N.C.S Autohub Pvt. Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raju George
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Statements of bill dated 19.12.2023, Copy of the advocate notice dated 17.05.2024.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V.A.Jayaraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹1,47,176/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹1,47,176/- (Rupees One Lakh Forty-seven Thousand One Hundred and Seventy-six only) from the defendants, together with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the suit until the date of realization, from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Statements of bill
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the amount due from the defendants based on their purchase of goods on credit.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Statements of bill
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a supplementary statement of bill supporting the total amount due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate shows that the statements of bill were taken from the computer, further supporting the evidence of amount due.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of the Advocate notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the demand made to the defendants to pay the amount due.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Returned Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the notice sent to the defendants was returned unserved.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Returned Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as additional evidence of the returned notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4(a)
Document Type: Original Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt provides proof of the mailing of the advocate notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Original Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This serves as further evidence of the attempt to notify the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 05/17/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 11/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited vs Shibu Thomas et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Deedi Financial Services Pvt Ltd vs Anilkumar G. et al regarding recovery of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited vs Varghese et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd vs Nazar Abdul et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Remya.S et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won