Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.574/2023

Case between Raja.A vs Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Service Ltd et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-IV (RCC)
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-02-10
Duration
approximately-1 year 10 months
Case Code No.
574
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a dispute regarding the maintainability of a suit due to an arbitration clause in a loan agreement. The plaintiff Raja.A and the defendants, including Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Service Ltd, are referred to arbitration.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court ruled that the suit is not maintainable and referred the parties to arbitration as per the arbitration clause in the loan agreement.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled that the suit is not maintainable and referred the parties to arbitration as per the arbitration clause in the loan agreement.
Key Reasoning:
The court found a valid arbitration agreement exists between the parties, making the suit not maintainable.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the arbitration agreement, it is revealed that there is valid arbitration agreement exists between the parties.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this petition is allowed and found that the suit is not maintainable before this court and the parties are referred to Arbitration.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raja.A
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cheif Manager, Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Service Ltd
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cheif Manager, Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Service Ltd
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manager, Mahindra and Mahindra Financial service ltd
Plaintiffs Documents
Original arbitration agreement produced by the plaintiff.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Abhishek.R.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.P.A.Sivakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit was found to be not maintainable before the court, and the parties were referred to Arbitration.
Evidence:
Therefore I am of opinion that the suit is not maintainable before this court and the parties are to be referred to Arbitration.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Arbitration Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original arbitration agreement was produced by the plaintiff, establishing the existence of a valid arbitration clause.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 03/13/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Shadil Shabeer, Nizam Mohammed vs Kesavadasapuram Muslim Jama Ath et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Chakkacheril Rubbers Pvt.Ltd vs Nilambur Traders regarding dismissal of suit.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Anil kumar et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mithun John Mathew vs Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala regarding mediation agreement.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won