Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 119/2022

Case between P.V. Roopa et al vs Prasad et al regarding rent control.

Court
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-02-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, P.V. Roopa and V.T. Reshmi, are seeking relief regarding rental issues against the respondents Prasad, Thasnim Sahir, and Merlin. The court has dismissed the rent control petition as it was not pressed by the petitioners.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition as the petitioners did not press the rent control petition.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition as the petitioners did not press the rent control petition.
Key Reasoning:
The rent control petition was not pressed by the petitioners.
Why Defendant Won:
The rent control petition was not pressed by the petitioners.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioners did not press the rent control petition, resulting in dismissal.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.V. Roopa
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V.T. Reshmi
Party Age
33
Relation
D/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasad
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thasnim Sahir
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Merlin
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K. Premnathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. N. Prajeena
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
RCP not pressed. Hence dismissed.
Evidence:
Both side represented. RCP not pressed. Hence dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.V. Roopa et al vs Prasad et al regarding rent control.
Case Code Year
Case between P.V. Roopa et al vs Prasad et al regarding rent control.

Quick Facts

Location
KOZHIKODE
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs Ramesh Sait regarding Rent Control Petition
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between M.K. Bushara vs Devadas P. regarding Rent Control Petition
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheela vs The Chevayur Service Co operative Bank Ltd regarding rent control petition.
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Shoukath Ali et al vs Sunandakumari et al regarding Rent Control Petition
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Nanditha Sreekumar vs Nadira Bhanu K. regarding rent control petition
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won