Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 1530/2013

Case between Pushpalatha.L vs Suresh et al regarding suit dismissal

Court
COURT O F ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt.Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-02-06
Duration
approximately-11 years 0 days
Case Code No.
1530
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Pushpalatha.L, filed a suit against the defendants, Suresh, Geetha Suresh, and the Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram. The case was finally heard on 06/02/2025 and dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as neither the plaintiff nor the defendants were present during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as neither the plaintiff nor the defendants were present during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the case due to the absence of all parties involved.
Why Defendant Won:
The court dismissed the case due to the absence of all parties involved.
Supporting Evidence
The court dismissed the case due to the absence of all parties involved.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pushpalatha.L
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Geetha Suresh
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram
Relation
represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Priyadarsini.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Radhakrishnan.K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Subhash.K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.S.N. Sivalal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Renjith.M.C
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and the defendant.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2013

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala State Ex-Service League Pulluvila Unit Committee et al vs Kerala State Ex-Service league et al regarding IA No.04/24
COURT OF THE ADDL. MUNSIFF (RCC)
Interim Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Anil kumar et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between City Plaza Flat Owners Association vs City Plaza Shop Owners Association et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Mithun John Mathew vs Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala regarding mediation agreement.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won