O.S. No. 433/ 2014

Case between Princily vs Sujith et al regarding restoration of review petition

Court

THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA

Judge

Sri. ARAVIND. P.

Order Date

2025-02-17

Duration

approximately-10 years 8 months

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Princily is the petitioner seeking restoration of a review petition against respondents Sujith and Bhadarudheen. The court decided to allow the restoration of the review petition.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court allowed the restoration of the review petition, indicating that the matter could proceed.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient grounds to restore the review petition.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found sufficient grounds to restore the review petition.

Supporting Evidence

After considering the materials, this court is of the view that the petition can be allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the petition is allowed and Review petition 42/ 2023 is restored to file.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Princily
Party Age: 54
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sujith
Party Age: 41
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Bhadarudheen
Party Age: 65
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. K.S. Anil Kumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. P. Hemachandran Nair
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

The petition is allowed and Review petition 42/2023 is restored to file.

Evidence:

this court is of the view that the petition can be allowed. Hence the petition is allowed and Review petition 42/2023 is restored to file.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification