Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 344 / 2022

Case between Praveen Kumar P et al vs Puthoor Sreekaramvelly Kshethram Committee et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.Meera John K.
Order Date
2025-09-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, represented by Praveen Kumar P and Sathianandan VC, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including the Puthoor Sreekaramvelly Kshethram Committee and its officials. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff, and no evidence was presented.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff, and no evidence was presented.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Praveen Kumar P
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sathianandan VC
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Puthoor Sreekaramvelly Kshethram Committee
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Viswanatha Kurup
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Latha Murlai
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bineesh
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Puthoor Sreekaramvelly Sree Kalari Bhagavathi Kshethram
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. KB Sivaramakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv.Shaheer MK
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction requested by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Plaint presented by the plaintiff under Section 26, Order VII, Rule 1 of CPC for permanent prohibitory injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Praveen Kumar P et al vs Puthoor Sreekaramvelly Kshethram Committee et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Praveen Kumar P et al vs Puthoor Sreekaramvelly Kshethram Committee et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode district
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Dr.Mahfoos Rahim vs Muslim Educational Society (Regd.) et al regarding suspension and inquiry proceedings
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Dr. Saliq Mohammed N. et al vs Muslim Edcational Society (Regd) et al regarding dismissal for default.
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Illath Abdul Majeed et al vs Minas Thenanchery regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dayaana K. vs Marunadan Malayalee et al regarding damages and mandatory injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Punnya Ranjith vs State of Kerala, Deputy Director Education, General Convenor regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won