Case Summary
Prasannakumar is the petitioner seeking the restoration of a suit while E.K.Rajeevan and the President of the 89th Booth Committee are the respondents. The court passed an order to allow the restoration of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Case
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration of the suit and closed the execution petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition for restoration was allowed.
The petition for restoration was allowed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition for restoration was allowed.
The petition for restoration was allowed.
Supporting Evidence
The court stated that the suit is restored.
Judgment Evidence:
RP IA allowed. it is submitted. suit restored. Hence EP closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prasannakumar
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o.Late.Gopalan Vydyar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- E.K.Rajeevan
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o.Raghavan Nair
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- President, 89th Booth Committee, Indian National Congress
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.G Manohar lal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Johny Sebastian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
suit restored
Evidence:
RP IA allowed. it is submitted. suit restored.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Unknown
Description:
EP closed
Evidence:
Hence EP closed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Prasannakumar vs E.K.Rajeevan et al regarding restoration of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Prasannakumar vs E.K.Rajeevan et al regarding restoration of suit