Case Summary
Prasad, represented by his power of attorney holder, filed a petition to set aside an ex-parte final decree passed without giving an opportunity for hearing. Respondents contested the petition, claiming the petitioner had knowledge of the proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Petition to set aside the ex-parte final decree dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit - Set Aside Ex-parte Decree
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner had knowledge of the proceedings and participated in prior applications, so the court found no merit in setting aside the decree.
The petitioner had knowledge of the proceedings and participated in prior applications, so the court found no merit in setting aside the decree.
Judgment Evidence:
For the reasons stated above the petition is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Prasad (Age not specified years)
Kannamballi House, Melmuri amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Sunitha (31 years)
Kannamballi House, Melmuri amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Pandaraparambil Veyudhan's Wife Ammunni (Age not specified years)
Kannamballi House, Melmuri amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Lakshmi (Age not specified years)
Velukkutty (Age not specified years)
Kannamballi House, Melmuri amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Geetha (Age not specified years)
Kannamballi House, Melmuri amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Set Aside Ex-parte Final Decree
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition to set aside the ex-parte final decree dismissed
Evidence:
For the reasons stated above the petition is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Photo copy of passport
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence that petitioner was abroad
Reference:
A1