Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 223 OF 2015

Case between Poonattil Krishnan's Children et al vs Poonattil Krishnan's Children et al regarding Partition

Court
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-11-30
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Case involves partition of ancestral properties among family members. Plaintiffs claim entitlement to shares as per genealogical table. Defendants contest shares and ownership of properties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiffs entitled to specific shares in ancestral properties. Defendants had no valid claim over the shares. Suit decreed for partition as per plaintiffs' entitlements.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition as per entitlements
Case Type
Partition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiffs proved entitlement to ancestral property shares through adduced evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit decreed and a preliminary decree for partition passed. Shares allotted and costs to be borne as mentioned.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Rajan (55 years years) Niramaruthur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Sreenivasan (45 years years) Niramaruthur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Chandrasekharan (42 years years) Niramaruthur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Chinnammu (59 years years) Niramaruthur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Karthiayani (57 years years) Niramaruthur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Kandar @ Krishnan (65 years years) Niramaruthur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Vasudevan (48 years years) Niramaruthur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Sarojini (67 years years) Niramaruthur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Udaya (26 years years) Niramaruthur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Ammadkkanakath Yoonus (45 years years) Ammadkkanakath House, Niramaruthoor amsom, desom, Tiur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Decree for partition passed
Evidence:
Plaintiff adduced evidence in tune with the averments in the plaint

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiffs adduced evidence in tune with the averments in the plaint
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiffs adduced evidence in tune with the averments in the plaint
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiffs adduced evidence in tune with the averments in the plaint
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer Notice with postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff caused to issue a notice to defendant No. 1 demanding partition
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff caused to issue a notice to defendant No. 1 demanding partition
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases