Case Summary
Case involves P.Nandakumar seeking enforcement of an Arbitration Award against Nizar and others. Court ruled that District Court has jurisdiction for execution of arbitral awards.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
P.Nandakumar (Age not specified years)
Admin Office, Krishna Towers, Aswini Junction, TUDA Road, Thrissur
Ratheesh C (Age not specified years)
Chathankulangarathodi (H), Vadanakurissi PO., Palakkad Dt.
Defendants
Nizar (Age not specified years)
412, Kalathupadikkal House, Valanchery S.O., Kottaram, Malappuram
Abdurahiman (Age not specified years)
412, Kalathupadikkal House, Valanchery S.O., Kottaram, Malappuram
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Arbitration Award
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Enforcement of the award
Reference:
Document Type:
Decision in Sundaram Finance Ltd. V. Abdul Samad and Another (AIR 2018 SC 965)
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Interpretation of Section 34 of the Act
Reference:
Document Type:
Decision in Bhoomatha Para Boiled Rice (M/s.) and Oil Mill V. M/s. Maheshari Trading Company and Others (AIR 2010 AP 137)
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Enforcement of the award by competent Civil Court
Reference:
Document Type:
Decision in Mahesh B. Shah V. Joseph, (2005 (3) KLT 787)
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Interpretation of 'court' in Section 36
Reference:
Document Type:
Decision in ICDS Ltd. V. Mangala Builders Pvt. Ltd., (AIR 2001 Kar. 364)
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Competence to execute arbitral award
Reference:
Document Type:
Decision in Metro Silks and Sarees V. Darpan Traders (2009 (3) KLT 916)
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Competence to execute arbitral award
Reference: