Case Summary
The case involves Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank as the decree holder and Ummer Farooq Paalappetty as the judgment debtor. The execution petition was dismissed due to the decree holder not being present in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed due to the absence of the decree holder. The court ruled that the decree holder did not produce the required documents.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the case as the decree holder was not present.
The court dismissed the case as the decree holder was not present.
Why Defendant Won:
The court dismissed the case as the decree holder was not present.
The court dismissed the case as the decree holder was not present.
Supporting Evidence
DH not present DH not present. Not represented. Batta not produced yet.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence EP dismissed for default Date : 19-01-2019
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank No.F.770
- Party Age
- 1
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ummer Farooq Paalappetty
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jiji.J,D.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Execution Petition dismissed for default due to the absence of the Decree Holder.
Evidence:
DH not present DH not present. Not represented. Batta not produced yet. Hence EP dismissed for default
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2017