Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
EP 44/2017

Case between Perumanna Klari Sahakarana Bank vs Rajeshkumar Chittilapally regarding default judgment

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2017-12-04
Duration
0 years, 9 months, 3 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Perumanna Klari Sahakarana Bank filed a petition against Rajeshkumar Chittilapally seeking a decree, but the petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was not present.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was not present.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not available
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Perumanna Klari Sahakarana Bank (1 years) The Secretary, Kuttippala PO.

Defendants

Rajeshkumar Chittilapally (18 years) Thanalur PO.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
Case Filed
Thu, 03/16/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases