Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 378 OF 2014

Case between Peringottukara Namboothiri yogakshema Sabha et al vs Cheracham Veettil Puthanpurayil Habeeb Rehman et al regarding money realization

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SRI. BIJU V.G., B.Sc., LL.B., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2015-03-18
Duration
Less than a year

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs, represented by an institution and a manager, filed a suit against defendants for the realization of money related to a chitty scheme. Defendants defaulted on payments leading to legal action.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The plaintiffs were granted a decree to realize the amount due with interest and costs from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Realization of Rs. 32,490 with interest
Case Type
Civil Suit - Money Realization
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: Plaintiffs are allowed to realize an amount of Rs.32,490/- with interest...

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Peringottukara Namboothiri yogakshema Sabha (Age not specified years) Anthikad, Trichur District Manager (Age not specified years) Tirur Branch, Tirur

Defendants

Cheracham Veettil Puthanpurayil Habeeb Rehman (36 years years) Kallingalakath House, Koottayi Post, Pin: 676 562, Tirur Taluk Sulaika (33 years years) Kallingalakath House, Koottayi Post, Pin: 676 562, Tirur Taluk Nahas (28 years years) Kallingalakath House, Koottayi Post, Pin: 676 562, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Money Realization
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Realization of Rs. 32,490 with interest and costs
Evidence:
Plaintiffs are allowed to realize an amount of Rs.32,490 with interest at the rate of 18% per annum...

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt issued by defendants for receipt of chitty amount
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Kuri agreement executed by the defendants
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copies of lawyer notice with postal receipts
Reference:
Ext.A3 to A5

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Tue, 03/18/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases