ORIGINAL SUIT No.203 OF 2006

Case between Pathummu et al vs Varikkodath Eni et al regarding injunction

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt. Vincy.T.V.

Order Date

2017-09-18

Duration

11 years 29 days

Case Closed

Mon, 09/18/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs filed suit seeking injunction, but the suit was dismissed as plaintiffs were absent and had no representation.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Not Applicable

Case Type

Civil Suit - Injunction

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed with costs as the plaintiffs were absent and had no representation.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Name of the plaintiffs are called. Absent. No representation. Defendants represented. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Pathummu
Party Age: 57
Relation: Daughter of Chenthiruthi Kunhahammed

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Hamza
Party Age: 45
Relation: Son of Areeparambil Hydru

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Koyakkutty
Party Age: 55
Relation: Son of Edayath Rayinkutty

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Thithutty
Party Age: 45
Relation: Daughter of Edayath Rayinkutty

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Biriyamu
Party Age: 42
Relation: Daughter of Edayath Rayinkutty

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Fathima
Party Age: 38
Relation: Daughter of Edayath Rayinkutty

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Kadiyakkutty Umma
Party Age: 74
Relation: Daughter of Pulikkal Beeran

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Varikkodath Eni and wife Iyyathumma's children

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Poomulli parambil Ithelu Mulla's son Enthi
Party Age: 76

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Pulikkal Beeran's daughter Kunhami Umma
Party Age: 83

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Varikkodath Sainabha
Party Age: 40

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Varikkodath Sameer
Party Age: 20
Relation: Son of Late Muhammedali

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Varikkodath Sameera
Party Age: 18
Relation: Daughter of Late Muhammedali

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Varikkodath Sahira
Party Age: 17
Relation: Son of Late Muhammedali

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Varikkodath Bushara
Party Age: 14
Relation: Son of Late Muhammedali

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Varikkodath Shafi
Party Age: 30
Relation: Son of Moideen

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Seenath
Party Age: 25
Relation: Wife of Varikkodath Shafi

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. P.Vijayaraghavan Nair
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.E.C.Suresh, Ibrahim
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Request for injunction

Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification