Case Summary
The petitioners include Pathumma and other family members of Late Abdulla, while the respondent is Santhosh.P.O. The case relates to a rent control petition which was heard for evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioners.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pathumma
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Kareem
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Ashraf
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Safiya
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Subaidha
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Santhosh.P.O
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.K. Sreekumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M. Vinod Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
The matter is listed today for evidence. Hence the petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P
Case Code Year
2022