Case Summary
Pandikasala Yusaf is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, which include Ramanattukara Village Officer and others. The case was dismissed for default when the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing. The case did not proceed due to lack of evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pandikasala Yusaf
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ramanattukara Village Officer
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thahasildar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Executive Engineer
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ramanattukara Muncipality Office
- Relation
- Represented by Secretary, Praseetha
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- District Collector
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.KM Musthafa
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.VG Neena
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Athira
- Appearance Type
- Government Pleader
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Prasanth Kumar GC
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff presented a suit for Permanent Prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pandikasala Yusaf vs Ramanattukara Village Officer et al regarding Permanant Prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Pandikasala Yusaf vs Ramanattukara Village Officer et al regarding Permanant Prohibitory injunction