Case Summary
Two plaintiffs filed a suit against three defendants seeking injunction relief, which was later dismissed by the court due to the absence of instructions from the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for injunction. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. The name of the plaintiff is called, absent. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Pallatti Kunhavaru (Age not specified years)
Perumanna amsom, Puthoor desom, Post Kuttippala, Tirur Taluk
Kadeeja (66 years)
Perumanna amsom, Puthoor desom, Post Kuttippala, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Kadeeja (55 years)
Perumanna amsom, Puthoor desom, Post Kuttippala, Tirur Taluk
Muneer (23 years)
Perumanna amsom, Puthoor desom, Post Kuttippala, Tirur Taluk
Sajeeb (36 years)
Perumanna amsom, Puthoor desom, Post Kuttippala, Tirur Taluk
Arafath (34 years)
Perumanna amsom, Puthoor desom, Post Kuttippala, Tirur Taluk
Suneera (32 years)
Perumanna amsom, Puthoor desom, Post Kuttippala, Tirur Taluk
Naseema (30 years)
Perumanna amsom, Puthoor desom, Post Kuttippala, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Injunction relief sought by the plaintiffs
Evidence:
The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. The name of the plaintiff is called, absent. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.