Case Summary
Petitioner sought delivery of property; case dismissed due to failure to pay batta.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Petition dismissed
Case Type
Civil Execution Proceedings
Final Judgment
No
Petitioner failed to pay batta for delivery, leading to dismissal.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Since the petitioner failed to pay batta for effecting delivery, the petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Palakkal Kadeeja
- Party Age
- 65
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pokkat Musthafa
- Party Age
- 40
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.Praveen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate for Pokkat Musthafa
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Petition for delivery of property
Evidence:
No batta paid for property delivery
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Execution Proceedings
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2013