Case Summary
Nithya.S.R filed a petition against Meena Krishna Raj concerning a rent control matter. The petitioner expressed that they were not interested in proceeding with the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as not pressed due to the petitioner's lack of interest in proceeding.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nithya.S.R
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Meena Krishna Raj
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.K.Rajeev Punnapuram
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Salini.S.Nath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sangeetha.R.V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Karthika.M.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the petition.
Evidence:
Counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the petition. Submission endorsed. Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2024