Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 229/2020

Case between Narmadha et al vs Marakkath Lal regarding Permanent injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Sri. Vivek P.
Order Date
2025-03-29
Duration
approximately-4 years 9 months
Case Closed
Sat, 03/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Narmadha and others, own property claimed through a partition deed, while the defendant, Marakkath Lal, is the legal heir of a former tenant. The plaintiffs seek an injunction to prevent the defendant from trespassing on the property.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiffs for a permanent injunction against the defendant, ruling in favor of the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiffs for a permanent injunction against the defendant, ruling in favor of the defendant.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to adequately identify the property in question and demonstrate their claim of possession.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs failed to adequately identify the property in question and demonstrate their claim of possession.
Supporting Evidence
The discussion above would show that PW1 had failed to dislodge the evidentiary burden on him.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed without costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Narmadha
Party Age
83
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sindhu
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sanjitha
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sooraj
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Marakkath Lal
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Registration copy of partition deed No.1330/1981, Copy of land tax receipt, Copy of police complaint filed by Sooraj.
Defendants Documents
Electricity demand and disconnection notice issued by Electricity Board, Property receipts issued by Kozhikode Municipal Corporation, Cash receipts issued by KSEB.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.B.Sivarama Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Akshay Kammath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.B.Sahasranaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Muhammed Hussain.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Permanent injunction sought to restrain the defendant from trespassing into the plaint B scheduled property.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs are not entitled for a discretionary relief of permanent prohibitory injunction as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the plaintiffs' ownership and possession of the scheduled property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the payment of land tax by the plaintiffs for the scheduled property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the police complaint filed by the plaintiff regarding the defendant's actions.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Electricity Demand Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Establishes the defendant's links to the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Property Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Proves that the defendant has financial dealings related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Property Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Further establishes the defendant's connection to the property.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Property Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Continues to demonstrate the defendant's ties to the property.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Cash Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Shows ongoing financial transactions related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Cash Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Indicates the defendant's responsibilities related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Cash Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Further substantiates the defendant's financial interactions with the property.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Property Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Illustrates additional financial involvement of the defendant with the property.
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Contains findings relevant to the identification of the scheduled property.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Narmadha et al vs Marakkath Lal regarding Permanent injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Narmadha et al vs Marakkath Lal regarding Permanent injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Thu, 07/09/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 03/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S U.B. Hardwares regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sujith K.M. vs P. Chandramathi @ Chandrika et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Panakkal Mammedkoya vs Fabir et al regarding partition
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kalarikandy Subash Babu (died), Durga Devi, Bindya, Sandya vs Kasthuri Bai, Ramani Bai regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Moideen.V.P vs Pathumma et al regarding setting aside a final decree
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Civil Suit Defendant Won