Case Summary
Naifa Fathima T.K, a minor represented by Abdul Nazer T.K, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and others. The plaintiff was continuously absent from the court proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff. The plaintiff was not present in court, leading to the decision of dismissal for default.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Naifa Fathima.T.K
- Party Age
- 15
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- State of Kerala
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Deputy Director of Education
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- General Convener
- Relation
- represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Aboobacker Siddeeque V.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default due to continuous absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is continuously absent. Name of plaintiff and counsel called in open court. It appears to the court that the plaintiff is not entered in proceeding with the matter further.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Naifa Fathima.T.K vs State of Kerala, Deputy Director of Education, General Convener regarding suit filed under Section 26 Order 7 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code
Case Code Year
Case between Naifa Fathima.T.K vs State of Kerala, Deputy Director of Education, General Convener regarding suit filed under Section 26 Order 7 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code