Case Summary
Muralidharan Pillai. N filed a petition seeking possession of a building against Dhanalekshmi and Ajith.T. The court concluded the proceedings and ordered the counter petitioners to vacate the premises.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The court directed the respondent to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition for possession was granted as the counter petitioners did not appear or provide any explanation. The petitioner was directed to be put in possession of the premises.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found no representation or explanation from the counter petitioners for their absence.
The court found no representation or explanation from the counter petitioners for their absence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found no representation or explanation from the counter petitioners for their absence.
The court found no representation or explanation from the counter petitioners for their absence.
Supporting Evidence
The counter petitioner absent. No representation. No explanation furnished.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the further proceedings in RCP is hereby stopped and the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of Plaint Schedule Building u/s.12(3) of Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muralidharan Pillai. N
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dhanalekshmi
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ajith.T
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Court fee, Legal Benefit Fund, Vakalath fee, Document Fee, Process fee, Petition fee
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. R.Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. R.G.Rakesh Chand
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.A.Sarada Devi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. C .V. Lakshmi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the Plaint Schedule Building.
Evidence:
Hence the further proceedings in RCP is hereby stopped and the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of Plaint Schedule Building u/s.12(3) of Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2023