Case Summary
The petitioner is Mukkom Mekhala Multipurpose Co-operative Society Ltd. represented by its Secretary. The respondent is Ranjith Lal, who did not appear in court for the hearing of the execution petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the Decree Holder was not represented, and the address of the Judgement Debtor was not properly furnished. Therefore, the execution petition was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
The Judgement Debtor was not properly summoned as the correct address was not furnished.
The Judgement Debtor was not properly summoned as the correct address was not furnished.
Why Defendant Won:
The Judgement Debtor was not properly summoned as the correct address was not furnished.
The Judgement Debtor was not properly summoned as the correct address was not furnished.
Supporting Evidence
Decree Holder not represented. Correct address of Judgement Debtor not seen furnished.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence EP is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mukkom Mekhala Multipurpose Co-operative Society Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ranjith Lal
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil
Defendants Documents
Nil
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Sanil Chandran. K. V.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mukkom Mekhala Multipurpose Co-operative Society Ltd. et al vs Ranjith Lal regarding execution petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Mukkom Mekhala Multipurpose Co-operative Society Ltd. et al vs Ranjith Lal regarding execution petition.