Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 44/2019

Case between Muhammed P.P et al vs P. Bava et al regarding default dismissal

Court
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Jomy Anu Isaac
Order Date
2025-02-19
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 02/19/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are Muhammed P.P and others, while the defendants are P. Bava and others. The case concerns a default dismissal due to the absence of plaintiffs and a lack of a filed chief affidavit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent and no chief affidavit was filed. Costs were granted to the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Costs of defendants
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent and no chief affidavit was filed. Costs were granted to the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs were not present and did not file necessary documents.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs were not present and did not file necessary documents.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiffs absent not present. No chief affidavit filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default with costs of defendants.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed P.P
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bichipathummayi.P.P
Party Age
65
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aboobacker. P.P
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdurahiman.P.P
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Gafoor.P.P
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P. Bava
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
O.N. Muhammed Koya
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Khadeeja. P.P
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K. Madhumohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Unnikrishnan Puthalath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.B. Sahasranaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ifthikar Malik
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Shaji.M.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs of defendants.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs of defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed P.P et al vs P. Bava et al regarding default dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed P.P et al vs P. Bava et al regarding default dismissal

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 02/19/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kolassery Abdurahim vs Kanjirangal Kareem et al regarding property delivery
Rent Control Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs Abhinav.K.P et al regarding dismissal of suit.
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Girija et al vs Komalam et al regarding partition
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Fathima Minha.K vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between M Sukumaran vs K. Ahammed et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won