Case Summary
Muhammed Naseef filed a suit against multiple defendants from ICICI Bank Limited. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Naseef
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Manager, ICICI Bank Limited
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Manager, ICICI Bank Limited
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Chairman, ICICI Bank Limited
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Shanavas.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Shahier singh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed Naseef vs ICICI Bank Limited regarding suit dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed Naseef vs ICICI Bank Limited regarding suit dismissal for default.