Case Summary
The case involves a petition for the final decree of partition after a preliminary decree was issued, detailing the division of property between the plaintiffs and defendants.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Final decree for partition
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiffs were entitled to specific shares of the property after evaluation by the Advocate Commissioner.
The court found that the plaintiffs were entitled to specific shares of the property after evaluation by the Advocate Commissioner.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result the suit is decreed as follows: The property having an extend of 17.87 cents shown as Plot 2 in Plan 1 is allotted to the 5/9 shares of the plaintiff in the decree schedule property.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Muhammed (37 years)
Cheriyamundam amsom, Parapputhadam desom, Tirur Taluk
Kadeeja (56 years)
Cheriyamundam amsom, Parapputhadam desom, Tirur Taluk
Fathima (55 years)
Cheriyamundam amsom, Parapputhadam desom, Tirur Taluk
Sulaikha (46 years)
Cheriyamundam amsom, Parapputhadam desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Abdul Kader (61 years)
Cheriyamundam amsom, Parapputhadam desom, Tirur Taluk
Abdurahiman (51 years)
Cheriyamundam amsom, Parapputhadam desom, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Final decree for partition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Division of property as per preliminary decree
Evidence:
Therefore I hold a view that the Commissioner's report and plan can be accepted and a final decree for partition can be passed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Submitted by Smt.Ramya.C.T., Advocate Commissioner, detailing the property division.
Reference:
C1
Document Type:
Commission Plan
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Submitted by Smt.Ramya.C.T., Advocate Commissioner, outlining the property allocation.
Reference:
C2