Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No.29 OF 2014

Case between Muhammad et al vs Assainar et al regarding specific performance

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Sri. Biju V.G., B.Sc., LL.B.
Order Date
2014-12-19
Duration
Not mentioned
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Muhammad filed suit against defendants seeking specific performance. The court rejected the plaint due to failure to produce balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaintiff's suit for specific performance due to failure to produce the balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not granted - Plaint Rejected
Case Type
Civil Suit - Specific Performance
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff failed to produce balance court fee inspite of availing several chances from 17.09.2014. Hence the plaint is rejected under Order 7, Rule 11(c) of Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Muhammad (53 years) Thekkinithethil Abdu, Kumaranallur Amsom, Desom, Ottapalam Taluk.

Defendants

Assainar (58 years) Kumaranallur Amsom, Desom, Ottapalam Taluk. Ayisha (50 years) Kumaranallur Amsom, Desom, Ottapalam Taluk. Kunhalan (49 years) Kumaranallur Amsom, Desom, Ottapalam Taluk. Ramlath (43 years) Kumaranallur Amsom, Vellalur Desom, Ottapalam Taluk. Nafeesakkutty (39 years) Kumaranallur Amsom, Vellalur Desom, Ottapalam Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Specific Performance
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaint Rejected due to failure to produce balance court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff failed to produce balance court fee inspite of availing several chances from 17.09.2014. Hence the plaint is rejected under Order 7, Rule 11(c) of Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 09/17/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases