Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No.79/2022

Case between M/s.Nirmal Associates vs K Surendran regarding realisation of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.Meera John K.
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
approximately-3 years 9 months
Case Closed
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Nirmal Associates, represented by its partner C Vijayan, is suing K Surendran for an outstanding debt of Rs. 42,994. The plaintiff claims the defendant failed to pay despite several demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 49,814 along with interest and costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 49,814 from the defendant with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 49,814 along with interest and costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff entitled them to a decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff entitled them to a decree.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 with Ext.A1 to A12 would show that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 49,814 from the defendant with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% from the date of decree till realisation of decree amount.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s.Nirmal Associates
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K Surendran
Party Age
55
Plaintiffs Documents
Computerized bills and ledger accounts, lawyer notice issued demanding payment.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Ahammed kutty Puthalath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Shamsudeen Puthalath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Rimna V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's entitlement to recover the outstanding amount.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 49,814/- from the defendant.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement for costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Computerized bill
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued to Golden Enterprises for goods sold.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Computerized bill
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued to Golden Enterprises for goods sold.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Computerized copy of ledger account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows accounts for goods sold to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Computerized copy of ledger account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows accounts for goods sold to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Computerized copy of ledger account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows accounts for goods sold to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Computerized copy of ledger account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows accounts for goods sold to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Computerized copy of ledger account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows accounts for goods sold to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Computerized copy of ledger account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows accounts for goods sold to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demanding payment of overdue amount from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of receipt of lawyer notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Partnership Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the legitimacy of the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Deed of Addendum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the partnership arrangements involving the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A12

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s.Nirmal Associates vs K Surendran regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s.Nirmal Associates vs K Surendran regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Thu, 06/30/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Fathima Aslaha E.P. et al regarding recovery of loan
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India, Narikkuni Branch et al vs Harikrishnan U.K., Vijayan U.K. regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sumina C.K. et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Calsun Finserve Pvt. Ltd. vs Shimna T.M. regarding realisation of money
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Dasan regarding realisation of money
The Additional Munsiff-I, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won