Case Summary
M/s.ICICI Bank Ltd is the plaintiff represented by Pradeep George, while Teena.S.A. is the defendant. The plaintiff was absent at the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and provided no representation, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
As plaintiff is absent and no representation made I find no reason to proceed with suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit stands dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s.ICICI Bank Ltd
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Teena.S.A.
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.G.S.Sanal Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Rinu.S.Aswan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation.
Evidence:
As plaintiff is absent and no representation made I find no reason to proceed with suit. Hence suit stands dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2017