Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 155/2024

Case between M/S. UCO Bank et al vs Firoz.K et al regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Savitha.T.P
Order Date
2025-06-26
Duration
approximately-2 years 11 months
Case Closed
Thu, 06/26/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/S. UCO Bank is seeking to recover money from the defendants, Firoz.K and Vijayan.M.V, due to default on a loan agreement. The defendants did not appear in court, resulting in the case being heard exparte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, where the defendants are ordered to pay the plaintiff bank an amount along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
An amount of Rs.1,60,768/- and interest at the rate of 6% per annum
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, where the defendants are ordered to pay the plaintiff bank an amount along with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The claim of the plaintiff stands proved through affidavits and documents that remain unchallenged.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The claim of the plaintiff stands proved through affidavits and documents that remain unchallenged.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint claim of borrowal and default of payment stands proved by the affidavit of PW1 and Exts.A1 to A4 and A6 and A7 documents which remains unchallenged.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.The defendants are jointly and severally directed to pay to the plaintiff bank an amount of Rs.1,60,768/- (One Lakh Sixty Thousand Seven Hundred And Sixty Eight Only).

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/S. UCO Bank
Relation
Rep. By its Branch Chief Manager and Principal Officer, Mr.Suil Pathro
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Firoz.K
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o.Koyakutty.K
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijayan.M.V
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o.Jayabalan
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application, Sanction letter, Agreement, Demand promissory note, Letter of guarantee executed by second defendant
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. A.Girish Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Shameena.K.C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff bank an amount of Rs.1,60,768/-.
Evidence:
The defendants are jointly and severally directed to pay to the plaintiff bank an amount of Rs.1,60,768/-(One Lakh Sixty Thousand Seven Hundred And Sixty Eight Only).
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till realisation.
Evidence:
The defendants are directed to pay jointly and severally an interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till realisation.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are directed to pay the costs incurred by the plaintiff in the suit.
Evidence:
The defendants are jointly and severally directed to pay the costs incurred by the plaintiff in the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the loan request made by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirmed the approval of the loan to the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlined the terms and conditions of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document served as a promise to repay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter of guarantee executed by second defendant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicated the second defendant's guarantee for the first defendant's loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Statement of waiver
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document reflected the waiver of presentation of the demand promissory note.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/S. UCO Bank et al vs Firoz.K et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/S. UCO Bank et al vs Firoz.K et al regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Fri, 07/26/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 06/26/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank, Mavoor Branch vs Mrs. Khyrunnissa. K et al regarding realization of money
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Noushad. P. et al regarding realization of money
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Akhil.C.R et al regarding recovery of loan amount
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Khairuneesa regarding realisation of money
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jayakumar et al vs Kamala et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Original Suit Plaintiff Won