Case Summary
M/s Speridian Technologies Private Limited is the plaintiff represented by its Managing Director Hrishikesh.S. Nair. The defendants include Treesa Mary Jose, Josekutty Mathew, and Binu. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not present to provide evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found the plaintiff absent and thus dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff did not present any evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence.
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence.
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is not ready or present before the court to adduce evidence, the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Speridian Technologies Private Limited
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Treesa Mary Jose
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Josekutty Mathew
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Binu
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Kowdiar S. Mohandas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Kazhakkuttom N Satheesh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2018