Case Summary
M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. filed a suit against Silby Antony and others. The court found the plaintiff absent with no representation and rejected the plaint due to inadequate court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of court fee payment.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Silby Antony
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Antony
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajesh. R
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunjumol
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Balby Antony
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Suhas Balachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Rejection of the plaint due to absence of the plaintiff and non-remittance of court fee.
Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2015