Case Summary
M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited filed a suit against Rasal and Nabeesath Beevi. The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of a remitted balance court fee and lack of a filed application.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint filed by the plaintiff was rejected by the court due to procedural issues. The judgment was delivered in open court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rasal
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nabeesath Beevi
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Suhas Balachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint was rejected due to no balance court fee being remitted and no application filed.
Evidence:
the plaint is rejected under order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023