Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1075 /2022

Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited vs Anoop et al regarding a financial dispute

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-08-07
Duration
approximately-3 years 1 day
Case Code No.
1075
Case Closed
Thu, 08/07/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited filed a suit against Anoop and others regarding a financial matter. The court found that no proper steps were taken to issue summons to the defendants, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to take proper steps for a significant duration.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to take proper steps for a significant duration.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not take proper steps to issue summons.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not take proper steps to issue summons.
Supporting Evidence
No proper steps seen taken till date as ordered by this court on 03-07-2025.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is dismissed for default. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anoop
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Preetha Prasad
Party Age
28
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subhadra
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shivan Achari
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. R. Ajayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Suhas Balachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to no proper steps taken to issue summons to the defendant.
Evidence:
The suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 08/07/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Shadil Shabeer, Nizam Mohammed vs Kesavadasapuram Muslim Jama Ath et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Chakkacheril Rubbers Pvt.Ltd vs Nilambur Traders regarding dismissal of suit.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Anil kumar et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mithun John Mathew vs Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala regarding mediation agreement.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won