Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1785/2023

Case between M/s Lab X vs M/s Biomed Diagnostic Services et al regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
approximately-3 years 16 days
Case Code No.
1785
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s Lab X, is seeking to recover an outstanding amount from the defendants, M/s Biomed Diagnostic Services and its Proprietrix, Neenu Abhilash, for supplies made against invoices. The defendants failed to pay the due amount despite multiple reminders and legal notices.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay ₹47,037/- along with interest and costs of the suit. The defendants did not present a defense, leading to a judgment based on the evidence provided by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of ₹47,037/- with interest and recover the costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay ₹47,037/- along with interest and costs of the suit. The defendants did not present a defense, leading to a judgment based on the evidence provided by the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged evidence demonstrating the defendants' liability to pay the outstanding amounts.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged evidence demonstrating the defendants' liability to pay the outstanding amounts.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence adduced by the plaintiff remains unchallenged. The oral and documentary evidence provided by PW1 clearly establishes that an amount of ₹47,037/- is due from the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of ₹47,037/- (Rupees Forty-Seven Thousand Thirty-Seven only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of realisation, from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr.Arun.S
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Biomed Diagnostic Services
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Neenu Abhilash
Party Age
33
Relation
Proprietrix
Plaintiffs Documents
Invoice No.AC/0853 dated 14.06.2022, Invoice No.AC/0911 dated 17.06.2022, Invoice No.AC/1078 dated 29.06.2022, bank statement dated 02.08.2022, letter dated 07.02.2023, advocate's notice dated 17.05.2023.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.P.Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.S.Sasikumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the sum of ₹47,037/- with interest.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: - (a)The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of ₹47,037/-.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: - (b) The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of this suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice No.AC/0853 dated 14.06.2022 acknowledged by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice No.AC/0911 dated 17.06.2022 duly acknowledged by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax Invoice No.AC/1078 dated 29.06.2022 also acknowledged by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of relevant bank statement evidencing the bank transfer of ₹10,000/-.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of the letter dated 07.02.2023 issued to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Advocate’s notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of advocate's notice demanding payment of dues.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original postal receipt evidencing delivery of advocate’s notice.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original postal receipt evidencing delivery of advocate’s notice.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original postal acknowledgment card received from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original postal acknowledgment card received from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of the advocate fee receipt for service of lawyer’s notice.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 06/14/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited vs Shibu Thomas et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Deedi Financial Services Pvt Ltd vs Anilkumar G. et al regarding recovery of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited vs Varghese et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd vs Nazar Abdul et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Remya.S et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won